Oops meant to reply to list. Begin forwarded message:
> From: Michael Bramwell <mbramw...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: (313) Re-issue "In The Dark: The Soul of Detroit" > Date: 10 July 2012 11:49:16 AM AWST > To: darnis...@cafe-ebola.com > > This is a good example of Deep House. For me a good deep house track has to > have some 313 style moodiness embedded into it… the youtube clip demonstrates > this better than I can explain it. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-hqOWnKdHU > > Mike. > > On 10/07/2012, at 10:03 AM, darnistle wrote: > >> This probably isn't the forum for such a question, but could someone give >> some examples of "deep house" in contradistinction to other styles of house? >> >> The term seems to be thrown about very often, but I still have no real sense >> of what "deep house" sounds like as opposed to (for example) jazzy house or >> disco house or micro house or whatever. >> >> >> >> On 7/9/2012 1:06 PM, kent williams wrote: >>> From what I gather the trend in Europe is away from Minimal and Tech >>> House to 'Deep House' -- a term that in context covers a multitude of >>> sins. I think that this has upped the visibility of real house music >>> in general and Detroit House in particular. >>> >>> Even if the mainstream of the new 'Deep House' thing is just tech >>> house with more 707 beats and out of context soul vocal samples, it >>> may be a case of rising water floating all boats. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:51 AM, David Powers <cybo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Jason, regarding In The Dark: The Soul of Detroit, you said: 'not so >>>> long ago you couldn't give music like this away so it's nice to see >>>> people "rediscovering" Detroit House'... Any idea why this would be >>>> the case? What has changed, and what do you think made such music >>>> undesirable in this time 'not so long ago'? >>>> >>>> ~David >>>> >> >> -- >> {}0+>| >> >> >
