I'm confused by this thread. I can understand why people mixing a lot of loops might complain about fade ins, but it sounds a bit strange coming from Djs who play Mills and Drexciya records. Do you guys always mix a record right from the start, or what's the problem with selecting a more mixable part of the record? Its important to remember that these tracks aren't just made for mixing and any that are tend to be lacking IMO...
Sean. robin pinning wrote: > hi wibo, > > i am with you all the way on this. tracks that fade in are impossible to > mix in correctly, unless you want to ruin the natural flow and structure > of your mix. > > drexciya (and related projects) do this a lot too and i've never > understood it. > > robin... > > > A lot of the old records by Mills have tracks on them that do not start at > > normal volume levels, but somehow the track gets faded in. (And not only > > Mills of course) > > > > Am I the only one who thinks of this being a real drag? I really like a > > specific track from AX009 but I find it really impossible to mix when there > > is a monitor speaker blasting in my left ear. These are the type of records > > that cause major trainwrecks in my DJ sets! > > > > I consider most of Mills' stuff being really DJ friendly, but why does he > > produce his tracks this way? Also, anyone got tips on dealing with this? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
