I agree with this to a point... the bootleggers would have a lot less market if the record were repressed -Joe
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 2:14 PM Subject: RE: (313) UR > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > From: "Andy Kellman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Would you ask a homeless woman why she hasn't built a house? > > thats not a very good comparison. anyway, the fact is that once > the mastering is done and the plates are made, the actual pressing > is not much more money, especially when youre guaranteed to sell a > few thousand more. UR keep their records in constant press. they > dont seem to have a problem with this bootlegging. if you strive > to have limited pressings, there are prices to be paid for that. > one of them is pissed potential customers who just want to buy > your music. someone else happened to step to the plate in place of > KDJ on this one. and with the demand like it is, who cam blame > them? i have the original amp dog knights 12", but i bought the > bootleg so that i can play it out as to not risk getting the damn > near irreplaceable original damaged at a gig. > > tom > > ________________________________________________________________ > andythepooh.com > > > >
