maybe questionable but it's the first thing that comes to mind: Autechre -
Tri Repetae++.  Freek Funk also comes to mind.  as does Public Energy No. 1,
Force + Form, and the Maurizio CD... so maybe i'm not answering the question
at all.  ;)

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erin Berg (WPL)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <313@hyperreal.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: FW: (313) techno/health


>
>
>
>
> >-Polmo Polpo "The Science of Breath"-also, deep, atmospheric, lush, but
> this
> >beat that just rolls underneath.
>
> I second that with strong favor - if you want to feel like you've got a
> thousand pounds of pressure pushing in on you, this CD will do the trick.
>
> I'll add just about anything on the Din and Toytronic label to this list
of
> things to look for. And Monolake of course.
>
> MEK
>
>
>
>                       "Erin Berg (WPL)"
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
"'313@hyperreal.org'" <313@hyperreal.org>
>                       .ca>                     cc:
>                                                Subject:  FW: (313)
techno/health
>                       08/28/03 10:36 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I've noticed this too.  Obviously, the faster the music the higher the
> heart
> rate and there's the whole psycho-acoustic debate, which is really
> interesting IMO, in which there have been some studies showing that the
way
> that some techno is produced (digital vs. analog) and how the ear/brain
has
> to process it due to said production, lends itself to inducing
> anxiety/raised heart beat/fight or flight response basically, as well. Or
> just brain shutdown - meaning the brain can't process the sounds properly
> so
> you find your thoughts wandering away from the music instead of becoming
> absorbed by it. Maybe someone else on the list knows more about this?
>
> But hey, I think its like anything that raises the heart beat (strenuous
> exercise for example) too much isn't healthy, too little and you're a
couch
> potato.  Everything in moderation, right?  From what I've heard 133bpm is
> supposed to be ideal.  It'll keep a dance floor going all night.  Anything
> faster and most people can't keep up no matter what age, anything slower
> the
> mind starts to wander if you are looking to dance.
>
> As for less banging techno, but that still has some forward momentum...
> -I second the motion on Scion's "Arrange and Process Basic Channel Tracks"
> -
> absolutely fantastic and the transition between track two and three never
> fails to make my body go freaky with joy.  You'll want to move, but it
> won't
> induce heart attack! ;)
> -Also Tinkertoy "Transatlantic Love Machine" - good deep sounds,
> implications of beat without a banging kick, which finally moves into
kick,
> but deep and rolling.  Its a relaxing beat due to the rest of the
> atmosphere
> of the music.
> -Polmo Polpo "The Science of Breath"-also, deep, atmospheric, lush, but
> this
> beat that just rolls underneath.
> -And of course there's always Plastikman :)
>
> Erin
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mann, Ravinder [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: August 28, 2003 10:18 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: '313'
> Subject: RE: (313) techno/health
>
>
> to quote Robin. "i must be getting old, i like my techno a lot slower
these
> days (yeah and i mean techno, not house)"
>
> Sorry if this is really boring but someone may have a view on this. Techno
> with its 120-130 bpm raises the heartbeat and Blood Pressure..yep Ive
tried
> it with a moniter....listen to Det Esc Co or Urban Tribe and everything is
> down again. At 38 you need to think of these things : )
>
> So is persistent exposure to fast bpms bad for your health ? Is it better
> to
> come home and not listen to techno to 'relax'. And keep it for the times
> you
> wanna feel hyped.
>
> Is there good slower techno out there that it not too 'noodly' and 'soft'.
> I
> don't mind the harshness is more to do with the BPMs.
>
>
>
> Rav
>
>

Reply via email to