i would be interested to know if the warp mp3's sound poor compared to the
other mo3s floating around.

obviously there willbe a small loss compared to cd or vinyl. when i
switched my enitre collection over to mp3 last year, i did that knowing
that i would be losing some fidelity, in exchange for convenience. and i
have never regretted it.

music should fit into your lifestyle, not dictate it.

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Martin wrote:

>
>
>
> > if you're a professional then obviously you should be working in the mp3
> > arena. you'd want wav's i would think.
>
> Not sure what the above means!
>
> >
> > but since this thread is about the warp site where you can download mp3s,
> > i don't see how dissing LAME is at all relevant.
> >
> > you said it yourself- LAME is fine for ipod users, which is certainly the
> > market Warp is going for with this endevour. For the technophiles, you can
> > go buy the CD, or the vinyl.
>
> Well that's where it started and like I said I don't rate LAME as an encoder
> nor do I think you need to use VBR either, again just MHO. I'm glad they are
> doing it, as it is the way to go. I going to buy a few and test them out on
> our rig, I just don't want to hear compression artefacts because if you do
> use the incorrect algorithms you can hear it, like a badly mastered record.
>
> I will post up info on appz if users are interested, just spreading info and
> I did state it was MHO, and like before easy does it.
>
>
>

Reply via email to