But what's the point in doing something if you aren't going to tell anyone about it? May as well make pots in a dark shed...
2/3/04 10:19 AM Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nobody needs to - but many do > > -----Original Message----- > From: Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:18 AM > To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brendan Nelson > Cc: Ken Odeluga; 313 > Subject: RE: (313) Mills > > > Mills doesn't need to "blatanly self promote". > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 March 2004 10:17 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brendan Nelson > Cc: Ken Odeluga; 313 > Subject: RE: (313) Mills > > > I can see the point of a commercially available DVD; I just didn't see the > point of him using the DVD in a club, unless he's getting RSI and needs the > odd break. Or is it blatant self-promotion? > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:09 PM > To: Brendan Nelson > Cc: Robert Taylor; Ken Odeluga; 313 > Subject: RE: (313) Mills > > > from a bizznass stand point, DVDs are definately the future of music > media. 2003 was the first year that DVDs sold better than CDs in the US. > If you walk into any major electronic/music/media store, you'll see the > DVDs right in front. and since the pricepoint has now dropped below $20 > for most DVDs, they're the new impulse buy for people who would have > bought CDs just a few years ago. > > And while you can pirate a DVD, most people don't have the HD > space/connection speed/patients to do it. So I'd expect a lot more DVDs > from your favorite DJs in the future. > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Brendan Nelson wrote: > >> I don't know if there's a point as such - it's a bit of a gimmick, >> really, that he used to try to build up anticipation/suspense in >> the crowd before he came on. But basically it's a product he's >> trying to sell and as I've said before I wouldn't mind at all if >> more DJs released DVDs like that; the gimmick of using it at the >> start of the set is going to wear off pretty quickly though. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: 01 March 2004 12:13 >>> To: Brendan Nelson; Ken Odeluga; 313 >>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills >>> >>> >>> I still fail to see the point of the DVD thing. Either I'm >>> stupid, or Mills' explanation for it is rubbish. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 12:07 PM >>> To: Ken Odeluga; 313 >>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills >>> >>> >>> While Saunderson was better than I expected, it didn't really >>> blow me away and like a few other people I was a bit confused >>> as to why Mills came on so late - which meant that I was >>> getting unfairly impatient towards the end of Saunderson's >>> set. It was effective and crowd-pleasing but nothing >>> ground-breaking really. >>> >>> I was really impressed by Mills, though, I have to say. Maybe >>> it's because it's a while since I've seen him, or because I >>> was swept up in the spirit of the night, but he seemed to me >>> to be very assured and on-form, and he played quite a lot of >>> tracks that I hadn't heard before but that were pretty >>> intriguing; the 909 stuff was pretty rude as well. And even >>> though I know this is serious flamebait, I actually think the >>> DVD thing at the start worked... *duck!* >>> >>> One of the things I worry about sometimes is that the world >>> of techno will hit a point where all new music is basically >>> schranz and if a DJ is going to really rock the crowd he/she >>> will have to basically play ancient classics. Periodically, >>> though, you hear a set that helps to persuade you that >>> there's still development and evolution of the sound going on >>> (Surgeon's set at Turnmills a few weeks back sounded like >>> just that sort of thing actually). So yeah, I thought Mills >>> did a really good job and he did exceed my expectations in >>> all honesty. The 2001 stuff was nice visual dressing but I'm >>> not so much of a "visuals" man and didn't really notice it >>> being "soundtracked" in any particular way... was nice to >>> look at though! >>> >>> Brendan >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ken Odeluga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: 01 March 2004 11:56 >>>> To: Brendan Nelson; 313 >>>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills >>>> >>>> >>>> Well what did we all think of Lost then? Especially Mills and >>>> Saunderson. >>>> Come on, let's 'ave opinions ... >>>> >>>> k >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 11:45 AM >>>>> To: 313 >>>>> Subject: RE: (313) Mills >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, it was a pretty surreal moment on Saturday when I saw that >>>>> in the magazine! I was on the lookout for a bunch of Absolutely >>>>> Fabulous-style fashion journos looking out of their depth at Lost, >>>>> but without success... >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Tom Churchill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> Sent: 01 March 2004 11:47 >>>>>> To: 313 >>>>>> Subject: (313) Mills >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Did anyone other UK list-members spot the Jeff Mills mention >>>>>> in the fashion >>>>>> pages of the Guardian's Weekend magazine on Saturday? >>>> Quite amusing: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,1156729,00.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> ############################################################## >>> ####################### >>> Note: >>> >>> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do >>> not necessarily represent >>> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless >>> specifically stated. This email >>> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended >>> solely for the use of the >>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have >>> received this email in >>> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> Thank You. >>> ############################################################## >>> ####################### >>> >>> >> > ############################################################################ > ######### > Note: > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent > those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. > This email > and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use > of the > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this > email in > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank You. > ############################################################################ > ######### > > > > ****************************************************************************** > ********* > Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and > not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies. > This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies > and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently > transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the > use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by > attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the "To" or "Cc" > lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for > delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended > recipient and have received this email in error. Any use by an > unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. > > If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager > by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please > then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies > thereof. Thank you. > ****************************************************************************** > ********* > > ############################################################################## > ####### > Note: > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent > those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This > email > and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of > the > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this > email in > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank You. > ############################################################################## > ####### > >
