i will say that theyve pushed through my recent comments within
hours. it seems like theyre really trying. i love discogs, i use
it daily.
tom
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: jason kenjar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:19:46 -0500
>Pardon me "Mr. taylor", but I dont see how somebody who spams the
list
>daily with one or two quick sentences of over-simplified
arrogant
>generalizations has the guts to call the discogs website "sh!t".
Im
>just one of the many free users and am not affiliated with the
site by
>any other means, but I still have to stand up for them if you
feel it
>necissary to besmirch their name.
>
>Discogs has been very helpful to me in the past. I can only
recollect
>a fraction of the many times I have found discogs to be totally
>helpful. Knowledge is power, and there is a lot you can learn if
your
>are willing to spend some time researching discogs. its also
totally
>free, you dont even have to be a member to search its information
>libraries.
>
>And is it so unthinkable and unforgivable that there would be
spotty
>information about Basic Channel? I consider myself a fairly well
>informed member of the under ground community, and even i think
all the
>basic channel records look alike. Artists like von oswald arent
about
>advertising themselves nearly as much as you do for yourself.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Monday, August 9, 2004, at 09:36 AM, Robert Taylor wrote:
>
>> Discogs is sh!t and there's loads of inaccuracies.
>
>
________________________________________________________________
andythepooh.com
