> And if you guys from Renegade Rhythm come back with a story like "well, me
> and the advent were having tea and scones and they say Carl Cox is
> alright", I'm gonna scream.


Alex,


1.
 What's your problem with Tea. I thought the British like Tea. I'm
personally a coffee drinker, but I don't personally have any problem with
Tea. What's yours?


2.
  So how many guys from Renegade Rhythms have you been speaking to on this
subject?  From my count , it was only 1 person.  So where does the
plurality
come in?

3.
Just curious, because your' statement above didn't make sense to me.
Actually, I think it's a common Logical Fallacy that you are displaying.

A+B=E
C+D=E
Therefore
C+B=E

Here's how it plays out:

Mani + Carl Cox = Like
RenegadeRhythms + Mani  = Like
therefore
Renegade Rhythms + Carl Cox = Like


This is called the Fallacy of "False Analogy".

"In an analogy, two objects (or events), A and B are shown to
be similar. Then it is argued that since A has property P, so
also B must have property P. An analogy fails when the two
objects, A and B, are different in a way which affects whether
they both have property P."


Unfortunately Logic doesn't work that way. And the resulting statement
is FALSE.

If Advent likes Carl Cox (not saying that he does, that was the Alex's
words), that's his perogative.  It's not going to stop my ears
from hurting when I hear Carl's music and mixing.

So go ahead and scream, but I've felt nothing from Carl Cox for
over 10-12 years (as long as I've known about him).


If continue with your logic, I might as well end, that you are British.
The British likes the Spice Girls. Therefore you like the Spice Girls.

Doesn't make sense does it?????




Cheers....

Dave



Reply via email to