Some people will never get it. It's what separates us from the 99.9% of commercial wanna-be "it" people :) I've always been a bit sceptical on the classics - either you were there or you were not. It's like watching the cartoons you did as a kid?
Apart from all this, it's a dead end topic -----Original Message----- From: Renegade808 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 17 December 2004 10:13 PM To: ha Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) At Les if someone told me that i don't get "it" because i dont like a classic track...well to me that stinks of arrogance...not everyone has to think "______" track is a classic...and i was just letting yussel know my opinion of that....so why should you care???? did i say something to you???? just go back underneath your rock and let me bicker and whine just like everyone else on this dang list!!! moral watchdog??? ha ha now thats funny, i dont think so ........ i'll leave that up to the others who feel its there role to protect the innocent michael www.renegaderhythms.com > > > geesh ... so after your rather successful alex rant you are the new > moral watchdog round here eh? > > let me see.. geesh .... yussel's opinion is not the end all be all > opinion for everyone ..... some agree and i'm sure some obviously > don't .... GET IT? > > jesus christ ... i get told all the time here in vienna that in the > anglo-saxon sphere (contrary to for example continental europe), at > least in academic circles, debaters are perfectly used to use sharp > attacks, absolute negations, controversial statements, though > arguments... tough in giving & tough in taking... so please try to > comply and give a fvcking straight retort (softened by irony if you > wish & can, hey alex i miss you, get out of your cave!) to an opinion > you don't like instead of whining about it's partiality > > > > Renegade808 wrote: > > At Les is not the end all be all track for everyone....some love it > and i am sure obviously some don't....everyone hears > differently.....just because someone does'nt agree does'nt mean they > don't get it..... > > and no one has to see Innerzone live to understand it either (maybe > this is what you had to do to understand it)..... the original track > is on wax and i would say its a good representation of the > track...like i said some feel it and some don't. i like the track and > other CC stuff but i would'nt go telling peeps they don't get it if > they don't like the same tracks i do......geesh > > michael > www.renegaderhythms.com > > > > > > > > > > what's with the undying love > > > wow- a little overdramatic, yeah? > > what's with the "love" of anything you like? > > i just really like the track. i think those opening chords are as > classic as anything from the genre. And so does CC as he rerecorded it > with Innerzone Orchestra and repeatedly stated that he viewed the song > as one of his "standards" > > > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: > > > > did i miss the memo? ive never thought at les was all that > remarkable really, especially compared to other things CC has done. > whats with the undying love for this track? > > tom > > ________________________________________________________________ > andythepooh.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
