Aaaahhhhhhhh!
It's just house music [EMAIL PROTECTED] it!
please please please please let's not make another f*cking subgenre!
MEK
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ds.net>
To
02/06/06 05:20 AM "313" <[email protected]>
cc
Please respond to Subject
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: (313) Classic beatdown tracks?
ds.net>
don't know the exact definition,
but two tracks which jump to mind are Yoav B's Energize,
as well, Theo Parrish's Dusty Cabinets
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tristan Watkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Simon Hindle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: (313) Classic beatdown tracks?
> Some other Theo Parrish/KDJ influenced labels would have to include
> Freude-Am-Tamzen and Soul Phiction - both fairly similar to Philpot. You
> sometimes find stuff like this on (generally thought of as) clickier
> labels too. Also check The Mole and LoSoul.
>
> Tristan
> =======
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.phonopsia.co.uk
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Simon Hindle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:13 AM
> Subject: Re: (313) Classic beatdown tracks?
>
>
> I guess my understanding of beatdown is similar - slower (ie no faster
> than mid-120 bpm), deep as hell, soulful with detroit stylings.
>
> http://www.beatdownsounds.net/ has a good description, though I wonder if
> it's simply a micro-genre. I just mention it because I've found a good
> amount of slower deep stuff recently (eg philpot records' releases) and
> wondered if there was perhaps more of this stuff that I was unaware of
> (beyond early house etc which is often slower), and so I thought 313
would
> be the best folk to ask about it.
>
> Please excuse my ignorance and bandying around of a buzzword I read in an
> interview :-)
>
> Client Services CCSU-ISTAR
> Level 27, Governor Macquarie Tower, Sydney, email
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Telephone: 61 2 9228 5501
> Facsimile: 61 2 9228 4435
> __________________________________________________________________
> This email message, including any attached files, is confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed.
>
> The NSW Department of Commerce prohibits the right to publish, copy,
> distribute or disclose any information contained in this email, or its
> attachments, by any party other than the intended recipient. If you have
> received this email in error please notify the sender and delete it from
> your system.
>
> No employee or agent is authorised to conclude any binding agreement on
> behalf of the NSW Department of Commerce by email. The views or opinions
> presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
> necessarily represent those of the Department, except where the sender
> expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of NSW
> Department of Commerce.
>
> The NSW Department of Commerce accepts no liability for any loss or
damage
> arising from the use of this email and recommends that the recipient
check
> this email and any attached files for the presence of viruses.
> __________________________________________________________________
>
>
>>>> Carlos de Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/06/06 6:59 PM >>>
> not that i could define "beatdown", although i have a certain dirty,
> 110bpm kinda housesound in mind, as featured on the mentioned 3rd
> ear-compilation... my question is another:
>
> is there a word for that (actually quite popular) style of house,
> discribed with "too many one-finger chords"? cc remix of theo's "falling
> up" or ame's "rej" and there are some more tracks for sure that i can't
> recall now. like, beatdown trance? ;)
>
> c*
>
> p.s.: simon, i don't know if it's "beatdown" what philpot are releasing,
> but if you mean that it has a similar vibe to some of theo parrish's or
> kdj's stuff: definitely yes! the german label "running back" and the
> stuff from dan electro (from france, i guess) go into that direction,
too.
>
> Peteri, Jochem schrieb:
>> wtf is a "beatdown" track?
>>
>> didnt like the rework btw, too many one-finger chords...
>> terry brookes is the C2 version of choice(the dub, that is)
>>
>>
>> groet,
>>
>> Jochem,
>> Servicedesk ICT
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: v12 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: maandag 6 februari 2006 3:09
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: (313) Classic beatdown tracks?
>>
>>
>> the CC remix is good,if not better than that -
>> but i must say that when i hear "beatdown" the first thing that comes to
>> mind
>> is the CD on 3rd ear,especially the opening tracks by Alston and Miller.
>> +the original 'falling up' or "backbone waltz" by 3 chairs.
>>
>> isnt carl's rework a bit too floor-friendly for a "beatdown" track btw?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Simon Hindle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:36 AM
>> Subject: (313) Classic beatdown tracks?
>>
>>
>> Carl's remix of Theo has all of Berlin going crazy. I read an interview
>> with
>> Andy Vaz of background records saying that Beatdown was all the rage
over
>> there now.
>>
>> So what are the best beatdown tracks?
>>
>> And does anyone else like the stuff that's been coming out on Philpot
>> records? Does that count as beatdown, even though it's made by Germans?
>>
>>
>>
>> The information contained in this e-mail communication is solely
intended
>> for the person/legal person to whom it has been sent, and as it may
>> contain information of a personal or confidential nature, it may not be
>> made public by virtue of law, regulations or agreement. If someone other
>> than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession of
>> this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read,
>> disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, you are requested to inform the sender of this e-mail message
>> of this immediately, and to destroy the original e-mail communication.
>> Neither Randstad Holding nv nor its subsidiaries accept any liability
for
>> incorrect and incomplete transmission or delayed receipt of this e-mail.
>>
>>
>
