>Yeah, I attempted a serious response, only to get pissed off and not >bother after the first response.
>-- >matt kane's brain That you did my friend. And it was as decent an observation as could be expected. But it said nothing to the question. That was my point. He made an observation, then asked a question. Instead of answering the question, most sat right down on his observation or, in your case countered with another. But you didn't speak to the question (and I was really looking forward to some intelligent and differing opinions on it). Tom can speak for himself though, and I'm starting to feel like a cheerleader. Just saying...be fair. Stick to the point. So.......in light of WHATEVER observations are made regarding the current lineup and slot selection by WHOMEVER, does anyone now feel like maybe those concerned initially back in the day were well founded? K
