You should print the thread and read it on paper, that will add some
warmth to it :) or even transcribe it down to paper and than read it :))
IMHO it's best to use best of both worlds. For pure sound analog sounds
better than software, but software can do some things that no analog
hardware can do, and it would be silly to totally ignore it.
Jernej
www.octex.si
Robert Taylor wrote:
This laptop debate is very boring - it's too cold and emotionless - it
doesn't have enough warmth and crackle :P
-----Original Message-----
From: v12 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 September 2006 17:30
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) The Laptop Debate/other digital devices.
and i dont say "digital is bad" - not at all - i.e. look at
convextion..much of his stuff sounds really good.
i dont know about his whole audio signal circuitry but i remember he was
using a digital jd800 as sound source for many of his track..
it aint deepchord,but still much more ear pleasing than the regular
software synth driven "piles of lego" ;)
J.T. correct me if im wrong
or check snorri arnarson's (octal/thule) timbres getting out of his
clavia synth - to get a fuller image of what i mean..
#####################################################################################
Note:
Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank You.
#####################################################################################
29092006
Club K4, Ljubljana [DJ set]