"kent williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Well even if you like Rich's sets these days, by their very nature,
there's not much to say about them -- minimal innit?  And if you don't
like Rich's sets these days, the less said the better.

On 12/1/06, Greg Earle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        - Greg (Who - along with several list lurkers - is amused that
                nothing was said about Rich's set)

I'll just quote Someone Else From Here's review, posted elsewhere:

"Rich was perfect.  Even when he screwed up once.  Played a lot of
whoknowswhat that sounds like sh!t when other ppl play it, then at the
end played "Pullover," "Spastik," bits of "I Called U" and "Transition,"
some crazy new Carl Craig track.  Killed it.

Mills' first record was so dirty it wouldn't track.  Then he
trainwrecked some.  Then he played The Bells.  Transitions awful,
EQ'ing painful, records you've heard 8,000 times.

And I hate to say it but after 2.5 hrs of digital perfection from
Richie, Jeff's records sounded terrible.  He may have been pushing the
mixer cuz I heard some clipping but overall the sound quality
difference between he and Hawtin was remarkable.  I couldn't be on the
main floor when he was playing.

But he was still pretty good.  ;]"

Like I said - funny how different people can have different reactions
to hearing exactly the same music ;)

        - Greg


Reply via email to