THIS WAS NOT MY POST YOU ARE REFERRING TO BELOW. 
Please read carefully before directing criticism to someone on this list.

----------
>From: "Vince Woolums" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "313 List" <313@hyperreal.org>
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [313] Regarding Business
>Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 8:16 AM
>

> It's important to remember, Cyclone, that you're essentially describing a
> social 'norm' for Australia, North America and Europe.  Actions and epithets
> of racism, oppression, religious purism and isolationism have been/are
> present everywhere, and have been/are present at nearly all times in
> 'history'.  These actions and epithets are not exclusive to white males.
>
> Vince Woolums
>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [313] Regarding Business
>
>
>> 1>  Concepts/words are not neutral, they are contested weapons which
> social
>> forces use in struggles for power.  There is no such thing as an
>> "objective"/politically neutral linguistics, and meanings are not static.
>> This is especially true of a loaded concept like racism.
>>
>> 2>  From Deleuze and Guattari, A THOUSAND PLATEAUS, CAPITALISM AND
>> SCHIZOPHRENIA, PP. 469-470
>>
>> "MINORITIES.  Ours is becoming the age of minorities.  We have seen
> several
>> times that minorities are not necessarily defined by the smallness of
> their
>> numbers but rather by becoming a line of fluctuation, in other words, by
> the
>> gap that seperates them from this or that axiom constituting a redundant
>> majority...  Nonwhites would recieve no adequate expression by becoming a
>> new yellow or black majority, an infinite denumerable set.  What is proper
>> to the minority is to assert a power of the nondenumerable, even if that
>> minority is composed of a single member.  That is the formula for
>> multiplicities.  Minority as a universal figure, or becoming
>> everybody/everything.  Woman: we all have to become that, whether we are
>> male or female.  Nonwhite: we all have to become that, whether we are
> white,
>> yellow, or black."
>>
>> 3>  In other words, the minority is defined by difference from a NORM, and
>> that norm in our society exists as the WHITE ADULT MALE.  Essential to
>> institutionalized racism & sexism is the measuring of a person's
> difference
>> and Otherness from this norm; it is for that reason impossible for a black
>> person to be racist in the same way as a white person, because the force
> of
>> this norm (and the socio-historical conditions that have given risen to
> the
>> norm) is not on their side.  On the other hand, it is always possible,
> even
>> for a white adult male, to enter into a process of becoming, and through
>> this process to become something other than the norm.  What is at stake
> here
>> is Otherness itself, the power to not have a "fixed identity" but rather
> to
>> experience life as an infinite journey.  And at this point I'd like to say
>> something controversial:  you don't have to BE black to make techno, but
> one
>> might say that, musically, you have to become-black in order to make
> techno,
>> in otherwords, you have to become part of the tradition of music which
> comes
>> out of black culture and speak/sing in a language that is not the language
>> of the majority.  (Of course there are other becomings, becomings-woman,
>> becomings-animal, becomings-molecular...)  a funky African rhythm,
> sensuous
>> strings, a bird floating through the heavens, little particles of sound
> that
>> hover in the air...
>>
>> /cyborg k
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------
>From: "Vince Woolums" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "313 List" <313@hyperreal.org>
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [313] Regarding Business
>Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 8:16 AM
>

> It's important to remember, Cyclone, that you're essentially describing a
> social 'norm' for Australia, North America and Europe.  Actions and epithets
> of racism, oppression, religious purism and isolationism have been/are
> present everywhere, and have been/are present at nearly all times in
> 'history'.  These actions and epithets are not exclusive to white males.
>
> Vince Woolums
>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [313] Regarding Business
>
>
>> 1>  Concepts/words are not neutral, they are contested weapons which
> social
>> forces use in struggles for power.  There is no such thing as an
>> "objective"/politically neutral linguistics, and meanings are not static.
>> This is especially true of a loaded concept like racism.
>>
>> 2>  From Deleuze and Guattari, A THOUSAND PLATEAUS, CAPITALISM AND
>> SCHIZOPHRENIA, PP. 469-470
>>
>> "MINORITIES.  Ours is becoming the age of minorities.  We have seen
> several
>> times that minorities are not necessarily defined by the smallness of
> their
>> numbers but rather by becoming a line of fluctuation, in other words, by
> the
>> gap that seperates them from this or that axiom constituting a redundant
>> majority...  Nonwhites would recieve no adequate expression by becoming a
>> new yellow or black majority, an infinite denumerable set.  What is proper
>> to the minority is to assert a power of the nondenumerable, even if that
>> minority is composed of a single member.  That is the formula for
>> multiplicities.  Minority as a universal figure, or becoming
>> everybody/everything.  Woman: we all have to become that, whether we are
>> male or female.  Nonwhite: we all have to become that, whether we are
> white,
>> yellow, or black."
>>
>> 3>  In other words, the minority is defined by difference from a NORM, and
>> that norm in our society exists as the WHITE ADULT MALE.  Essential to
>> institutionalized racism & sexism is the measuring of a person's
> difference
>> and Otherness from this norm; it is for that reason impossible for a black
>> person to be racist in the same way as a white person, because the force
> of
>> this norm (and the socio-historical conditions that have given risen to
> the
>> norm) is not on their side.  On the other hand, it is always possible,
> even
>> for a white adult male, to enter into a process of becoming, and through
>> this process to become something other than the norm.  What is at stake
> here
>> is Otherness itself, the power to not have a "fixed identity" but rather
> to
>> experience life as an infinite journey.  And at this point I'd like to say
>> something controversial:  you don't have to BE black to make techno, but
> one
>> might say that, musically, you have to become-black in order to make
> techno,
>> in otherwords, you have to become part of the tradition of music which
> comes
>> out of black culture and speak/sing in a language that is not the language
>> of the majority.  (Of course there are other becomings, becomings-woman,
>> becomings-animal, becomings-molecular...)  a funky African rhythm,
> sensuous
>> strings, a bird floating through the heavens, little particles of sound
> that
>> hover in the air...
>>
>> /cyborg k
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to