I dunno, Tristan's the person to speak to on that.
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Kendrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2007 14:39 To: Toby Frith; Alan Heneghan; Thomas D. Cox, Jr.; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) votes Really!! Whats it like to play on?? Are the Eqs any good and are the FXs on pointless?????????? -----Original Message----- From: Toby Frith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2007 14:33 To: Paul Kendrick; Alan Heneghan; Thomas D. Cox, Jr.; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) votes So does Corsica Studios.... -----Original Message----- From: Paul Kendrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2007 14:35 To: Alan Heneghan; Thomas D. Cox, Jr.; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) votes http://www.funktion-one.com/FF6000.htm Al check the link, funktion 1 started re making them. The Panarama Bar in Berlin has one I think.... -----Original Message----- From: Alan Heneghan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2007 14:18 To: Paul Kendrick; Thomas D. Cox, Jr.; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) votes I own a A&H 62 and really like the sound of it, but find it a bit cramped sometimes, but superb at home. I'm also a big fan of the Formula Sound PM80 (a mixer that has been out of production for over 10 years, very popular with sound engineers) and Ecler SCLAT100. Both, 19" rack mounted, super clean signal path, no effects, tank like workhorses. Played on an original UREI at a club once, but as mentioned, the lack of EQ was daft. So out of the choices given, 62. Alan Heneghan > From: Paul Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:17:12 +0100 > To: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <313@hyperreal.org> > Conversation: (313) votes > Subject: RE: (313) votes > > I agree with Tom on this every mixer has unnecessary features and lots > are badly laid out, gains on the back is just silly. I am still to > find the perfect mixer.. > > Im currently using this, vestax PMC-CX > > http://www.vestax.com/v/products/mixers/pmc-cx.html > > Not the best, EQ could be better and the filters are pointless I don't > think mixers should have FX like this. It just annoys me when you hear > people using them all the time to cover there bad mixing.....if you > want FX buy a separate unit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 October 2007 12:58 > To: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (313) votes > > On 10/24/07, Alan Heneghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Gains on the back are to stop IDIOT DJs turning them up and >> destroying > >> sound systems. > > so people who play 70's LP cuts next to 00's 12" cuts have to pay the > price for morons? wrong answer. that mixer with the gains on the back > is the biggest pile of sh*t ive ever used in my entire life. > > that said, i dont like any of the popular mixers. ive played on a&hs, > vestaxes, numarks, eclers, ranes, etc. not one of them has ever made > me feel like i needed to go out and buy one. that said, ive never > messed with a classic rotary mixer either, but they dont have built in > EQs which is also stupid. the people who make and design mixers are > just plain old bad at what they do in my opinion. there's always too > much crap on there you dont need. > > tom For all the latest news and comment visit www.telegraph.co.uk. This message, its contents and any attachments to it are private, confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination of the whole or part of this message (without our prior written consent) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Incoming and outgoing telephone calls to our offices may be monitored or recorded for training and quality control purposes and for confirming orders and information. Telegraph Media Group Limited is a limited liability company registered in England and Wales (company number 451593). Our registered office address is: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT.
