What should have happened [as we all know, discogs is far from perfect] is that a note should be added making it clear that the item is - still a rip off - but an 'authorised repress' [aka bootleg] of a real release rather than an out and out un-released set of tracks by the artist [another type of bootleg].
I might make a submission myself for that ammendment to be made for the entry, if no one else has by this evening. -----Original Message----- From: Emile Facey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 March 2008 07:56 To: Thor Teague Cc: list 313 Subject: Re: (313) Kraftwerk bootleg? Looks like you did. Strange that discogs still credits and links to EMI despite it being a bootleg, is this the standard rule with Discogs? On 3 Mar 2008, at 03:39, Thor Teague wrote: > Did I buy a Kraftwerk bootleg and not realize it? > > http://www.discogs.com/release/79678 > > I have the yellow and blue vinyl. I had no idea this was a bootleg? > Did I miss a thread again? >
