We often can see producers, moved by trendy approaches, do bad music.
This same trendy superficiality often results in choosing trendy names.
But it's not always true. It's just common. We have great wonderful
records in not very well done or graphically interesting covers.
Sometimes because the artist really don't care about it. It turns to
be a secondary thing. Ok.
A good artist may imprint the same capabilities that makes him do
good music in the making of a graphically interesting cover, or in
choosing a non-stupid-trendy pseudonym. As i said, after agreeing
with you, sometimes.
Kw
On 29/03/2008, at 00:36, /0 wrote:
ok, I take back ridiculous and apologize. I generally respect what
you say on the list. if you care to, please explain the comment
that I disagreed with.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kowalsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "/0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[313]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: (313) what's in a name (was:venting/Something Simple,
Miami)
It's perfectly possible to qualify in the large majority of
sequenced music producers of today.
What is ridiculous is your arrogance and your lack of argumentation.
On 28/03/2008, at 20:35, /0 wrote:
that statement is both ridiculous and impossible to qualify.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kowalsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "/0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[313]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: (313) what's in a name (was:venting/Something
Simple, Miami)
No.
But sometimes the same reason that makes the music sound good
is the reason that makes the producer NOT choose a stupid name.
Kw
On 28/03/2008, at 18:35, /0 wrote:
so does the music sound better if the producer has a
supercool! name?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Taylor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Kane's Brain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Joel Gajewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:51 PM
Subject: RE: (313) what's in a name (was:venting/Something
Simple, Miami)
Techno/electronic artists aren't known for their imagination -
it's
always been a bugbear of mine - too many techno artists give
themselves
predictable sci-fi name and track titles
Rob Taylor
VT Librarian
x8599
Hatch Desk x1088
VT Library Users' Guide
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Kane's Brain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 March 2008 16:45
To: Robert Taylor
Cc: Joel Gajewski; [email protected]
Subject: Re: (313) what's in a name (was:venting/Something Simple,
Miami)
On Mar 28, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Robert Taylor wrote:
He was probably telling the truth - why would he have heard of
him?
He's
not exactly famous
And it's not exactly rare to have pseudonymous techno artists
with the
same pseudonym. MIA, for example, did not get sued by either
UR or Sub
Static, forcing MIA to always be suffixed by (the German one),
(the
Detroit one), or (the irritating one).
--
matt kane's brain
http://hydrogenproject.com
aim -> mkbatwerk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
##################################################################
## ## ###############
Note:
Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless
specifically stated. This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have
received this email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank You.
Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under
English law, is at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .
4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in
England and Wales has its registered office at 124 Horseferry
Road, London SW1P 2TX.
VAT no: GB 626475817
##################################################################
## ## ###############
