Silly me!

So what defines dubstep? Hard and edgy? Firm and moist? Turgid?


> Burial isn't really dubstep - it's too wet and soft
>
>
> Rob Taylor
> VT Librarian
> x8599
> Hatch Desk x1088
>  VT Library Users' Guide
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nik Stoltzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 April 2008 16:19
> To: Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) Recalling that dubstepxtechno thread
>
> Weren't you raving about the last Burial album a few months back?
> Wouldn't people call that dubstep?. Not that it matters, I think.
>
> When it comes to 'dubstep' I do not like it more or less than any other
> music - I just like good music. When you say you don't like dubstep, do
> you have a particular sound or artist in mind? Or do you literally not
> think much of a whole tranche of music much of which you won't have
> heard? ;)
>
> Personally, I can't get enough of Elemental & 3D - Blob at the moment.
> Love it.
>
> N
>
>
>
>> i still cant be less impressed with dubstep. it annoys me to no end
>> how much people are on its jock.
>>
>> tom
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Mann, Ravinder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Aye, some dubstep seems to be going 4/4. See also releases on Hessle
>
>>> Audio. Here's a mix I've been enjoying recently . .
>>>
>>>  http://www.djdowee.com/dreamvol1/dowee-dreammix-march2008.mp3
>>>
>>>  1. likhan - uwill
>>>  2. pinch - 136 trek
>>>  3. likhan - terre
>>>  4. pangaea - nest
>>>  5. untold - test signal
>>>  6. appleblim & peverelist - circling  7. scuba - outmost  8.
>>> peverelist - the grind  9. scuba - inmost  10. scuba - beta  11.
>>> peverelist - erstwhile rhythm (forsaken remix)  12. 2562 - circulate
>
>>> 13. benny ill vs. hatcha - poison  14. a made up sound - sleepwalk
>>> 15. 2562 - kameleon  16. pattie blingh - brother (2562 remix)  17.
>>> 2562 - channel two  18. ramadanman - carla  19. kode 9 vs. badawi -
>>> den of drumz  20. headhunter - locus lotus
>>>
>>>  Rav
>>>
>>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>  Sent: 23 April 2008 15:00
>>>  To: [313]
>>>  Cc: Kowalsky
>>>  Subject: Re: (313) Recalling that dubstepxtechno thread
>>>
>>>
>>>  dave huismans ole!
>>>
>>>  Kowalsky schreef:
>>>  > http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?id=93995
>>>  >
>>>  >
>>>
>>>
>>>  To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go
>>> to http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm
>>>
>>
>
>
> #####################################################################################
> Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
> email
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
> the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
> email in
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank You.
>
> Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under English law, is 
> at 124 Horseferry
> Road, London, SW1P 2TX .
>
> 4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England and Wales 
> has its registered
> office at 124 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 2TX.
>
> VAT no: GB 626475817
>
> #####################################################################################
>


Reply via email to