Hey Pixelherodev, g-w1, and anyone else inclined to harass—let’s be clear: I’m 
human. Accusing me of being a bot without meaningful discussion is discrediting 
and ostracizing. This behavior only fosters division. If we’re here to share 
knowledge, let’s do it with respect. Harassment has no place in this community. 
Targeting people who want to engage isn’t helping—it’s undermining the 
community.

Let’s be kind, welcoming, and encouraging to one another. The community will be 
better for it. Is that really asking too much?

When submitting patches, it’s standard to include relevant error messages or 
logs when reporting issues. Unfortunately, instead of constructive feedback, I 
was asked to remove the comments explaining my work, only to then be asked to 
provide explanations afterward. This kind of feedback isn't productive. It’s 
discouraging to face unconstructive criticism or harassment with every 
submission to 9fans or PR on GitHub. At times, it feels like my name alone may 
be a trigger for some, similar to how "Lunduke" seems to be for others. I'll 
just use an alias to help prevent further triggering.

— Vic

On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, at 05:16, sirjofri wrote:
> 06.10.2024 19:26:35 Noam Preil <n...@pixelhero.dev>:
>> https://github.com/g-w1/plan9zig/pull/2
> 
> Oh, I see.
> 
> Well, it seems the conversational LLM got better as the mails look more
> human-generated now.
> 
> That also explains why Vic didn't put too much effort into the pull
> request to be applied. Maybe it's more like a "please do the work", but
> it's still the worst way to do it.
> 
> I don't like those times we live in, with GPT being used as it is...
> 
> sirjofri
> 
> (Written by me, sadly _not_ obviously)

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T9d57d40811a8ec5d-M28bfcadb34ea6b9adf0ba296
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Reply via email to