On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, [iso-8859-1] Forgeot Eric wrote: > would " A B c d e f g a & x6 A2 " allowed then ? This is notated correctly.
> so my question is will the notation with for ex. " A > B c d e f [A2g] a " still be possible, in addition to > the & possibility (this [A2g] was implemented in > abcm2ps Abcm2ps does not support it. In abcm2ps [A2g] is equivalent with [A2g2] . Please explain to me: would there be any difference between [A2g] and [gA2] ? Groeten, Irwin Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~* Chazzanut Online: http://www.joods.nl/~chazzanut/ To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
