Oooh. I like Jack's suggestion. Mainly because nothing would have to be
changed. If it ain't broke and all that...
However, I don't think it has to be as complicated as Jack has it.
> A2 E2 G2 A2 [&[& A B c d e f g a &\
> A A A A A A A A &\
> A G F E D C B, A, ]& D2 E2 A2 ...
If the standard already says that
A2 E2 G2 A2|A B c d e f g a & A A A A A A A A & A G F E D C B, A,|]
is ok, then
A2 E2 G2 A2|A B c d e f g a &\
A A A A A A A A &\
A G F E D C B, A,|]
must also be ok!
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
