On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:51AM, Robert Olson said: > > On Feb 17, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Fred Dech wrote: > > >i've run into the same problem on a unicast network. bridging, RAT > >received > >audio, but VIC did not receive any video. other clients connected to > >the > >same venue could see both the bridged video and audio. i've not yet > >tracked down the problem. when/if i do, i will share the results. > > That's one description of the problems one sees with firewalls that > have reflexive ACLs installed - outgoing traffic on a port enables > incoming traffic on that port. Since rat uses the same source and > destination port, it will work properly. Vic uses different source and > dest ports, so the traffic won't flow back in. > > --bob > aha! this client is behind a firewall. the firewall is purported to be completely open. but i'll bet that it has "reflexive ACLs" installed. that is another in a series of new NAT/firewall terms i've been learning about as of late. it sounds good. i will bring it up with their extremely helpful firewall administrator and see if he is willing to do anything to help solve this problem.
thanks you so much, Bob. --fred
