Thank you for your suggestions. We know on what grounds to approach to the court. They have not complied by the Office Memorandum of the Government of India. They didn't ensure any compensation to those whose paper became nightmare due to the scribe. Please see Ritesh Tomar's post on FB his scribe provided by the school ruined his paper. Will the UGC and the CBSE own any accountability? why we were asked to take writer's permission days prior to the exam? who will compensate if a blind visits centre multiple times unlike non-blind candidates? We have many more solid grounds. I'm hopeful that the Judiciary will entertain our plee. Friends do share your experiences of UGC/CBSE NET. We want people to volunteer in gathering responses from those who don't use internet frequently in different cities. Anybody? please? On 6/29/15, Mohib Anwar Rafay <mohibra...@gmail.com> wrote: > What were the terms of varrification of the scribe? > Yes, the complaint may be made to UGC/HRD, but don't waste your > precious time and money going to the court. Judiciary is almost > corrupt and don't pay any serious attention to such matters. > > On 6/29/15, avinash shahi <shahi88avin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm reproducing my FB post and solicit members responses who appeared >> for the exam >> >> >> Let me share my experience with you all,others do share we will write >> collectively to the CBSE/UGC/HRD Ministry. friends from the media >> fraternity are humbly requested to cover widely. >> >> 1. The UGC and the CBSE have outrightly overlooked the writer >> guidelines issued by the government of India for conducting exams for >> persons with disabilities. Instead of verifying candidate-own scribe’s >> document on the date of examination, The CBSE imposed extra burden and >> asked blind candidates’ to take permission one day prior to the exam. >> Now one could easily apply one’s common sense to comprehend the >> discrimination. When the all non-disabled aspirants were busy doing >> last-minute preparation, blind candidates struggled from pillar to >> post in reaching the different centres for availing permission to use >> writers. Most of them who are very poor, were forced to incur extra >> money unnecessairily Courtesy the CBSE. >> 2. My examination centre was in Bosco Public School Pashchim Vihar >> Delhi. And to my disappointment, CBSE officials didn’t give writer-fee >> to my scribe. They contended that the CBSE would only provide writer >> fee to those scribes who were arranged by the schools. I argued that >> when authorities had verified the documents provided by my scribe and >> he fulfilled the criteria recquired for writing the exam; why this >> different treatment meted to him? The CBSE representative again >> telephoned to the head office and was informed that the CBSE >> formulated the policy where scribes braught by the candidates would be >> provided no remuneration. I ask why this discrimination? If need >> arises I’m determined to go to the Court against the UGC and the CBSE. >> We’ve faced enough humiliation. Its no more be tolerated. I urge other >> candidates to share their experiences,we will collate, compile, then >> correspond with the UGC, CBSE and the HRD Ministry. >> >> >> -- >> Avinash Shahi >> Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU >> >> >> >> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of >> mobile phones / Tabs on: >> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Search for old postings at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ >> >> To unsubscribe send a message to >> accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in >> with the subject unsubscribe. >> >> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, >> please >> visit the list home page at >> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of >> the >> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; >> >> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails >> sent through this mailing list.. >> > > > -- > Mohib Anwar Rafay > > Phone: +919 555 555 765 > > > > Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of > mobile phones / Tabs on: > http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Search for old postings at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ > > To unsubscribe send a message to > accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in > with the subject unsubscribe. > > To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please > visit the list home page at > http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in > > > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. >
-- Avinash Shahi Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
