Michael StJohns <mstjo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> The multiparty (group) symmetric key solution is only wanted for a
> single corner of the solution space - low latency, no cost
> systems. E.g. lightbulbs. Given there is a worked example of the
> insecurity of multiparty symmetric key systems (e.g. the attack on the
> symmetric signing key of the HUE lights), I'm unclear why anyone at all
> would think that pursuing a known bad solution in the IETF is a good
> idea.Also, there is the question about cost, so look at: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-lwig-2-lightweight-crypto-00.pdf From this morning. 261ms for k163 on a specific device. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
