> This is in-line with my observations, that I wasn't able to noticeably slow > down 4D with heavy web accesses to A4D. So I'm going to monitor the load and > hope performance doesn't change, when my web application gets more traffic.
If your web traffic gets really heavy, you can always add Remotes as web servers to balance the load. > When I've started with A4D (on 4DV12 at that time), I had the impression > after reading the A4D manual, that Aparajita favored NTK slightly over the > 4D web server, frankly more because of possible security issues in 4D's web > server than differences in performance. It wasn't because of security or performance, it was because of bugs in 4D's web server. > Like to hear your opinion, which one is the better A4D companion now. I haven't done any real comparison testing with v13's web server vs. NTK, so I can't really say. Regards, Aparajita www.aparajitaworld.com "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/
