One major difference between NTK and 4Ds webserver are the JSON commands. I've worked with these doing development, but don't have any experience in production yet. I know Aparajita has provided a library to handle JSON parsing, but I get the impression that NTK's commands will provide better performance.
Does anyone have any thoughts on JSON handling performance? Do the differences matter? Tom D On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Aparajita Fishman wrote: >> This is in-line with my observations, that I wasn't able to noticeably slow >> down 4D with heavy web accesses to A4D. So I'm going to monitor the load and >> hope performance doesn't change, when my web application gets more traffic. > > If your web traffic gets really heavy, you can always add Remotes as web > servers to balance the load. > > >> When I've started with A4D (on 4DV12 at that time), I had the impression >> after reading the A4D manual, that Aparajita favored NTK slightly over the >> 4D web server, frankly more because of possible security issues in 4D's web >> server than differences in performance. > > It wasn't because of security or performance, it was because of bugs in 4D's > web server. > > >> Like to hear your opinion, which one is the better A4D companion now. > > I haven't done any real comparison testing with v13's web server vs. NTK, so > I can't really say. > > Regards, > > Aparajita > www.aparajitaworld.com > > "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." > - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org > > _______________________________________________ > Active4D-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev > Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/ > > _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://active4d-nabble.aparajitaworld.com/
