Based
on some things I've done in the past that are similar in nature to this, I would
be extremely surprised if MS supports it. That said, it didn't
prevent me from doing it anyway ;-)
I'd
like to see the script when you are done to look at what is involved.
You'll definitely want to put add an "undo" option as part of it.
As you mentioned, the schema version would be the major concern.
Who knows how Microsoft uses it within applications. I suppose other
non-MS apps could also use it to determine what to expect in the
schema.
As far
as extending the schema goes, you will inevitably run into the people
that don't want to do it because it is "bad", and probably even more so if it
isn't supported by MS. I'm a big proponent of extending the schema
when it makes sense. Especially in this case, you aren't adding to the GC
(which of course isn't an issue in W2K3). It all comes down to how
much the customer needs the new tools and is not wanting to
upgrade.
Robbie
Allen
|
Title: Message
- RE: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... use of 20... Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- Re: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... use ... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... use ... Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
- [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... use of 2... Robbie Allen
- [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... use of 2... Dean Wells
- Re: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... ... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... Dean Wells
- RE: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedb... Joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] Seeking some ... Dean Wells
- Re: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedb... Glenn Corbett
- RE: [ActiveDir] Seeking some feedback ... use ... Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)