I have to agree to the second option - they may not even know that they do it. 
Over the time people tend to forget about lag sites, want to force replication 
once in a while, and what the ... Are those checkboxes in replmon for? Do I 
want the information to replicate across sites? Sure!
And right after hitting OK there's a "head banging against the monitor"-sound - 
Aahrg - Lag sites.

Gruesse - Sincerely, 

Ulf B. Simon-Weidner 

  Profile & Publications:   
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=35E388DE-4885-4308-B489-F2F1214C811D   
  Weblog: http://msmvps.org/UlfBSimonWeidner
  Website: http://www.windowsserverfaq.org


 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
>Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 7:26 PM
>To: ActiveDir.org
>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD lag sites and replication
>
>Imagine a glass ceiling with a girl in a skirt standing on 
>it\man in a kilt standing on it and you're standing under the 
>ceiling someone tells you not to look up. Do you not lookup or 
>at somepoint  lookup ? - even if you did not mean to - via a 
>mirror or some other third party method. The fact that you can 
>means at somestage you may do what you were not supposed to 
>see even if if you had no intention of doing so. Applying this 
>analogy to Mr Rustons scenario they may be trusted and do it 
>or they may have no intention of doing so -  but have the 
>interlect of a tibetian Yak and do it anyway. Another Guinness 
>please......
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Molkentin, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 02:52:28
>To:<ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org>
>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD lag sites and replication
>
>Neil asked... 
>  
>> I'm looking to implement one or more lag sites, with staggered 
>> replication schedules. (i.e. NYC lag replicates tues and thurs, 2-4 
>> am; LON lag replicates mon, wed and fri 2-4 am).
>>  
>> We're concerned that admins can still force replication outside of 
>> these hours using repadmin or replmon etc.
>>  
>> Is there a (supported) way to ensure that replication can ONLY occur 
>> within the hours described above?
>
>Tell them not to?
>
>Seriously, if something is being put in place for a reason and 
>it is explained to them, why would they want to go and work 
>against it? Isn't the person implementing it someone in a 
>position of authority to say "this is how we'll solve this problem"?
>
>As always... "there are seldom good technological solutions to 
>behavioural problems".
>
>Given this is all hypothetical, and yet to be a problem, but 
>you get what I am regurgitating here.
>
>My $0.02 inc GST.
>
>themolk.
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
r¯zm§ÿðÃœ¶+Þv*è®æ—ûa­æ±«)

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx

Reply via email to