On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Joanthan Gilligan wrote: > As far as waiting for a PyPPM replacement, ActiveState's Trent Mick > said last May that "a PyPPM-like tool is not tractable without high > ongoing maintenance costs," which makes it "difficult to make a > business case for a PyPPM-like tool."
That's true, but that's not all he wrote. He also said: > > As you noticed, PyPPM is no longer part of ActivePython 2.3.x. .... > > [W]e think that everyone is better served if we spend a bit of time > > to figure out how to leverage some of the new developments in Python > > (such as PyPI, the Python Package Index and the wider adoption of > > distutils, the distribution package) to come up with a good > > next-generation system. I've just been hoping to get a better handle on what we're talking about with the phrase "a bit of time" for coming up with this next-generation system, so we can make longer-range plans. -- Bob Kline mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rksystems.com _______________________________________________ ActivePython mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs Other options: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/ActivePython
