Fair enough. You're right and I appreciate the correction.
--On Friday, October 01, 2004 9:37 AM -0400 Bob Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Joanthan Gilligan wrote:
As far as waiting for a PyPPM replacement, ActiveState's Trent Mick said last May that "a PyPPM-like tool is not tractable without high ongoing maintenance costs," which makes it "difficult to make a business case for a PyPPM-like tool."
That's true, but that's not all he wrote. He also said:
> As you noticed, PyPPM is no longer part of ActivePython 2.3.x. .... > [W]e think that everyone is better served if we spend a bit of time > to figure out how to leverage some of the new developments in Python > (such as PyPI, the Python Package Index and the wider adoption of > distutils, the distribution package) to come up with a good > next-generation system.
I've just been hoping to get a better handle on what we're talking about with the phrase "a bit of time" for coming up with this next-generation system, so we can make longer-range plans.
-- Bob Kline mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rksystems.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan M. Gilligan Senior Lecturer in Environmental Science and Public Policy Department of Earth and Environmental Science 615-322-2420 VU Station B #351805 Dept. Office: 322-2976 Vanderbilt University Fax: 322-2138 Nashville TN 37235-1805 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ ActivePython mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs Other options: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/ActivePython
