Bob Kline wrote:
> The last time we brought up this question [back in 2004] Trent Mick wrote:
>> Unfortunately, that limbo will have to remain for the time being.  
>> We'll be
>> catching up with ActivePython builds fairly soon, but there likely won't
>> be a PyPPM replacement for some time.
> 
> Hello, Trent.  I think you'll agree we've not been nagging you 
> constantly about this question. 

Very true.

 > We're just hoping that you're not using
> "some time" as a euphemism for "forever." :-)
> 
> Any update on this topic that you can throw our way?

Unfortunately, no. Setuptools and PyPI have really come a long way and, 
somewhat, changed the game. What *hasn't* changed is that I don't have 
as much time as I would like to work on this. Currently there are no 
plans to have a PyPPM replacement anytime soon.

Trent

-- 
Trent Mick
trentm at activestate.com
_______________________________________________
ActivePython mailing list
ActivePython@listserv.ActiveState.com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
Other options: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/listinfo/ActivePython

Reply via email to