..on Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:41:58AM +1300, Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> But, you know, I don't really mind. It's not that I want there not to
> be a bus, like I wanted there not to be a lab. A bus would be good,
> probably. At worst, harmless. I do wonder, though, if all our relief
> at reaching consensus hasn't dented our rigour.
Indeed..
Admittedly I feel too out of touch with media-arts culture in NZ to attempt a
relevant/useful suggestion. So, I find myself either defaulting to generic
proposals or raising a chipped shield in defense of Damian's.
Here are a few for the record:
1/ A Spain<->NZ exchange program (La Coruna, Leon and Seville are
antipodal to
CHCH, Wellington, Auckland). I could help with the Spanish interface.
2/ Public content distribution platforms:
- Leveraging mid-tier phones for a mass hand-held exhibition
featuring
works by list members. Could be locative, dislocative,
augmented,
textual, aural, all or none of these.
- Mixed-reality platform for bringing digital sculpture to
public space
targeting smartphones. This is an area I'm working in right
now, so
yes, your reading of bias is perfectly correct.
- 'Urban Screens', expensive without hardware sponsorship.
Worked out
well for Federation Square, Melbourne however.
- Yes, That Incumbent Bus: mobile gallery and workshop,
rear-projection
screen, streetside moving-image/software-art program.
3/ A hardware-for-art corporate interface a la
http://lowtech.org/intro/ for
media-arts spaces in NZ more generally.
I'll pop a couple up on the wiki regardless.
> I'd rather go by helicopter.
'SnorkeLab'?
Just dropping it in the pool, so to speak..
--
Julian Oliver
home: New Zealand
based: Berlin, Germany
currently: Berlin, Germany
about: http://julianoliver.com
_______________________________________________
Ada_list mailing list
[email protected]
http://aotearoadigitalarts.org.nz/
