Thanks for those reflections Suzon!

+ for the links - I believe that the dance piece was supposed to be silent (Becca?), though I didn't realise that beforehand to make it clear on the guff about it...

For Julian waka, (thank you Julian) I was quite chocked that people in
Amsterdam asked to repeat it and also cut short the effort of Trudy to show photos for her presentation. (unconsistancy with Amsterdam encouragements to
show another setup than the white walls during the presentation of
DistanceLab!)

That's a great point - they spent a lot of time wanting to marvel over the MIT funded facilities at Distancelab while being really unable to cope with the glitches and 'imperfections' that come with genuinely experimenting with network possibilities and location over a great distance and time difference!

And Trudy had put a lot of effort into preparing her presentation and photos, and she and I worked out that it was really easy to share them via the chat window in ichat - but because they didn't contact us to test everything in advance they were unprepared for it.


Apart from the culural misunderstanding, (which is important to consider, organisers' check list while preparing the event should have a point about their protocol(s) and if there are any specific one(s) for participants),

That's another really great point. The protocols should be clarified in advance. But that should also be covered by basic respect for the contributors! A lot could have been smoother if we had been able to actually plan it in advance, but I think the details of a lot of sessions got lost in the overall planning.


the link with amsterdam people made me think about "how people perceive and understand remotness and the scale of remotness". It seems to me that there is a very personal experiential element according where you are from, where you have been physically. E.g.: countryside does not mean the same in Europe
and NZ!

Yes!
And also it occurred to me afterwards that the other projects in that session - Distancelab in Scotland and the Arctic project were about people going to other people's spaces, which felt like a really different kind of 'local' than what we were talking about. I'm sure they are great projects but they felt imposed upon their 'local', no matter how invested the communities with which they worked really are. I'm sure I'm being unfair about them - I was tired and quite confused by then! That was another kind of disconnect for me though - there was little scope to address the things that were actually important to us.

Please let us know where the documentation about the Access Grid
mini-symposium will be accessible. Thanks again.

yes. it might take us a short while to get that together though.

best
zita





Cheers

Suzon
Australia Council for the Arts Fellow
http://suzonfuks.net
http://www.igneous.org.au
mob:+61-404 292 119 – Tel:+61-7-3255 8355
3/27 Waverley St - Annerley  QLD  4103 - Australia
skype: suzonfuks


On 22/03/10 10:39 AM, "Zita Joyce" <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear ADA

So the Electrosmog festival is over....  I'm really happy with all of
the projects and events we organised here, and then I have
reservations about the broader festival, and especially our interface
with it. I should probably work through those more coherently before
trying to say them out loud in public, but these are my initial
thoughts anyway...

I think we did great projects, but in the future it would be more
productive for us to do things like this (networked festivally things)
on our own terms, with more ownership of the discussion, themes,
structure, aesthetic and timezones(!).

This didn't end up being quite the distributed global festival I first
thought, and there was an uncomfortable centre-periphery relationship
inherent in the whole thing. Mostly this is because it was initiated
and coordinated by Eric Kluitenberg at De Balie in Amsterdam, and he
has a lot of experience at organising big ambitious festivals. I was
on the production / editorial email list, but few people on there
really contributed to the overall discussion + planning, and my focus
was on trying to work out the timezone issues. It seemed like everyone
was really doing their own things, and it managed to be both too
centralised to take ownership of, and too distributed to really have a
coherent focus.

There were a few particularly tricky problems, mostly technical issues
(ie their stream dropping out after the first day so we couldn't even
watch it except in occasional bursts of quicktime), and the fact that
the organisers in Amsterdam were juggling a huge number of
contributors across different platforms and only just keeping on top
of it (a pretty amazing feat it must be said). Most problematic for me were the cultural differences that became apparent - especially in the
way Julian's contribution from the waka was handled in the Deep Local
session, when Eric and Gerbrand got flustered and talked over the
Karakia to try to get them to stop and start it again (and then they
couldn't manage to show Trudy's photos and then I was so grumpy about
all that I lost track of my notes and didn't say any of the things I
meant to say).

Culturally too perhaps, the themes themselves were hard to get a
handle on from here, and most simply didn't feel relevant, to me at
least...



Still, some great things happened here, and we now need to make sure
we have documentation of it all on the ADA website, especially:
- Becca Woods' Backyard Dances
(There is a recording of the video stream here:
http://suzonfuks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/backyard-public_stream.mov)
- Sean Kerr's M4RI Ping Pong Pop, with Clinton Watkins, Adam Willetts
and Nathan Thompson (this is a still of the visual output, but I
should be able to get more documentation from De Balie -
http://www.seankerr.auckland.ac.nz/PINGPONGPOP/)
- The Teletrust performances coordinated by Su in Dunedin (which
should be documented here - http://teletrustlab.net/)
- The Access Grid mini-symposium 'What is the Perfect Network' (which
Su and I will compile documentation of this week if possible)
- Julian's Waka.Wireless (http://greenbench.org/project/waka- wireless)
- Trudy's great presentation to the Deep Local session


Some of the projects we launched are ongoing / permanent:
- The Korawiki:
http://korawiki.aotearoadigitalarts.org.nz/wiki/doku.php/kora:home
- Luke Munn and Sam Hamilton's lovely (with a really cool interface)
Klanggang / Soundwalk:
http://www.lukemunn.com/2010/02/klanggang-soundwalk.html
- Helen Varley Jamieson and Vicki Smith's 'X Marks the Spot', which
will develop between now and their 10/10/10 festival:
http://upstage.org.nz/blog




This was a huge project, and took a lot of planning and figuring out
over a really long period (it's over a year now since I first met with
Eric in Amsterdam about it). It was a network effort, coordinated by
the ADA trust electrosmog 'subcommittee' (myself, Su Ballard, and
Julian Priest) with James Charlton, and a lot of input from a lot of
other people.

Thanks, then, to everyone who spoke, performed, organised, negotiated, commented, and generally made things happen technically, socially, and
creatively:

Su Ballard
Julian Priest
James Charlton
The Waka.Wireless crew: Mike Poa, Jonah Marinovich, Don Hunter, Te
Wainuiarua Poa, Sue James
The Dunedin TeleTrust team
Trudy Lane
Becca Wood
+ the Backyard Dancers (who I'm afraid I don't know the names of)
Sean Kerr
+ the M4RI Ping Pong Pop performers: Sean Kerr, Adam Willetts, Nathan
Thompson, Clinton Watkins)
Helen Varley Jamieson
Vicki Smith
Luke Munn
Sam Hamilton
The participants in the Access Grid 'What is the Perfect Network'
session
James' students who made projects responding to the themes of
Electrosmog
Everyone who has contributed to the Korawiki so far
Everyone who listened / watched / wrote comments + responses to the
list and in whatever channels were available over the weekend
Stella Brennan
Douglas Bagnall
Honor Harger

(I'm sure I'm forgetting people! my apologies if so...)



best,
Zita








-----------------------------------------------




This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not
guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message
and any attachments.

Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more
information.
_______________________________________________
Ada_list mailing list
[email protected]
http://aotearoadigitalarts.org.nz/

------ End of Forwarded Message













-----------------------------------------------




This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not
guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message
and any attachments.

Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more
information.
_______________________________________________
Ada_list mailing list
[email protected]
http://aotearoadigitalarts.org.nz/

Reply via email to