Hi, On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 03:07:54PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: > In my opinion any change to policy should reflect expectation of community as > a whole.
"Rough consensus" does not mean *everybody* has to agree.
> Current propose doesn't change anything to the direction of improvement for
> community.
Oh, to the contrary - ensuring that allocations from the last /8 are
not burnt like crazy (by permitting arbitrary fast trading) might not
be something good for you personally, but for the *rest* of the community,
it might be actually a good thing (depending on whether or not you
believe in the rationale for the last /8 policy).
The last /8 is not there to do "business as usual, based on IPv4" - it
is there to enable *new* market entrants to run a few critical things
with IPv4, while the main deployment has to happen on IPv6.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
pgpl4nGh3RFrW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
