As variant:

1. I receive /22
2. I create 2 x inetnum with type ASSIGNED PA
3. I announced it for about 1 month
4. I sell it

Such way I fully correspond to 5.* statements.

23.04.2015, 15:54, "Opteamax GmbH" <[email protected]>:
> On 23.04.2015 14:50, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
>>  3.0 Goals of the Internet Registry System
>>
>>  can be treated by a lot of ways.
>>
>>  I (personally) doesn't find any prohibition in st. 3.0 to have many /22 per 
>> LIR.
>
> Number 3 after the _link_ not 3.0 (#51 anchor)
>
> Number 5.1 paragraph No.3
>
> "The LIR must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the allocation."
>
> so the LIR opened and requesting the /22 only for selling does not
> fullfill the policy. Without a real assignment , the /22 may never be
> sold, as the LIR first need to fullfill his confirmation
>>  23.04.2015, 15:39, "Opteamax GmbH" <[email protected]>:
>>>  On 23.04.2015 14:31, Vladimir Andreev wrote:
>>>>>    openig a bunch of LIR only for transfering their /22 V4 to another LIR
>>>>>    is - and always was - abusing the policy.
>>>>   Any links to documents proving it?
>>>  https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-643#51
>>>
>>>  Number 3
>>>>>   but for me the way you are proposing to run a "business" is
>>>>>   almost the same as the one of a guy selling stolen stuff ...
>>>>   Such a comparison is incorrect.
>>>  Maybe my comparison lacks do to difficulties translating into english:
>>>  The guy selling the stuff does not (necessarily) know that the one he
>>>  bought it from stole it. There are some of those shops, everybody know
>>>  that they not ask where stuff comes from, but nobody can blame the
>>>  shopowner ...
>>>
>>>  Jens
>>>>   23.04.2015, 15:27, "Opteamax GmbH" <[email protected]>:
>>>>>    Hello Gabriel,
>>>>>
>>>>>    openig a bunch of LIR only for transfering their /22 V4 to another LIR
>>>>>    is - and always was - abusing the policy. So you acutally don't want to
>>>>>    speak against the change of Transfer-Policy but want to keep the
>>>>>    backdoor open.
>>>>>
>>>>>    So if you think the last /8 policy is not OK - where consensus was
>>>>>    reached - you should stand up and make a change proposal for that.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Knowing the way to bypass policy still does not mean, that it is
>>>>>    fair/legal. IMHO LIRs which are willingly abusing policies shall get
>>>>>    their entire resources withdrawn immediately, as they are not willing 
>>>>> to
>>>>>    be part of the community, so shall not profit from community.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Sorry, but for me the way you are proposing to run a "business" is
>>>>>    almost the same as the one of a guy selling stolen stuff ...
>>>>>
>>>>>    Regards
>>>>>    Jens
>>>>>
>>>>>    On 23.04.2015 14:05, Infinity Telecom SRL wrote:
>>>>>>     Hello Gert,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     "at the transfer services"  i saw sellers that want 17-20 USD per IP,
>>>>>>      this is crazy, do you want forward ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Do you think this is a normal ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     If right now they ask soo much even when they know someone like me 
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>     open a new LIR an close after 1 year.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     What will happen when someone like me will open a LIR and pay 2 yrs
>>>>>>     before to move the IPs  to the old LIR
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I tell you what will happen,  the sellers will put another 5-7 USD 
>>>>>> per
>>>>>>     IP, for sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Most of the guys that are pro this proposal have large blocks for 
>>>>>> sell..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I dont have large blocks.. i want to keep my IPs and have more 
>>>>>> resource..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     /--
>>>>>>     Cu stima,
>>>>>>     Gabriel Voitis | Sales Manager
>>>>>>     /[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     /INFINITY TELECOM SRL  |  Bd-ul Iuliu Maniu nr 7, Corp A, Scara 2
>>>>>>     Mobil: +40 0725 677 477  |  Tel: +40 021 7808805  |  Fax: +40 021 
>>>>>> 7808806
>>>>>>     /[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>    --
>>>>>    Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team
>>>>>    Jens Ott
>>>>>
>>>>>    Opteamax GmbH
>>>>>
>>>>>    Simrockstr. 4b
>>>>>    53619 Rheinbreitbach
>>>>>
>>>>>    Tel.:  +49 2224 969500
>>>>>    Fax:   +49 2224 97691059
>>>>>    Email: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>>    HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur
>>>>>    Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
>>>>   --
>>>>   With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
>>>>   General director, QuickSoft LLC
>>>>   Tel: +7 903 1750503
>>>  --
>>>  Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team
>>>  Jens Ott
>>>
>>>  Opteamax GmbH
>>>
>>>  Simrockstr. 4b
>>>  53619 Rheinbreitbach
>>>
>>>  Tel.:  +49 2224 969500
>>>  Fax:   +49 2224 97691059
>>>  Email: [email protected]
>>>
>>>  HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur
>>>  Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989
>>  --
>>  With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
>>  General director, QuickSoft LLC
>>  Tel: +7 903 1750503
>>
>>  !DSPAM:637,5538ed66295344115222871!
>
> --
> Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team
> Jens Ott
>
> Opteamax GmbH
>
> Simrockstr. 4b
> 53619 Rheinbreitbach
>
> Tel.:  +49 2224 969500
> Fax:   +49 2224 97691059
> Email: [email protected]
>
> HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur
> Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989

-- 
With best regards, Vladimir Andreev
General director, QuickSoft LLC
Tel: +7 903 1750503

Reply via email to