> Because the policy says "one /22 per LIR". Policy sets this rule only for /22's received from RIPE NCC.
Indeed, RIPE NCC will not allocate you several /22. I have tested it :) The only way is to receive allocations from other LIR (own or belonging to other companies). An such order doesn't abuse any policies. If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging allowing to receive second /22 etc. 23.04.2015, 16:35, "Gert Doering" <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:22:51PM +0300, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> What from this quotation is? Please give me a link. >> And what statement exactly of the current policy is abusing? > > Stop turning in circles. This question has been answered before. >> Also I would like to receive concrete answer to the question: >> Why using multiple /22's for own company is not abusing but selling is >> abusing? > > Because the policy says "one /22 per LIR". > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
