It's was just a logical chain. Prerequisite is "having multiple /22 in LIR is abusing".
In my opinion members that open multiple LIR's and sell received /22's are not abusers and RIPE NCC is not abuser. But if anybody says "<name> abuses policies" that man have to declare "RIPE NCC is also abusing policies". 23.04.2015, 16:49, "Opteamax GmbH" <[email protected]>: > On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote: >> If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main >> "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging >> allowing to receive second /22 etc. > So you agree my initial reply that actually the change does not go far > enough, it'd be better to completely prohibited selling IP (v4) and > instead enforce withdrawing of not announced IP-Space aand returning > it into the pool? > > That way I am pretty sure we could quickly loosen the current /8 > policy and return to a policy allowing requests of more then one /22 > if need is shown .... and need may NOT be selling, but that'd be > forbidden anyway then ;) > > BR Jens > > -- > Opteamax GmbH - RIPE-Team > Jens Ott > > Opteamax GmbH > > Simrockstr. 4b > 53619 Rheinbreitbach > > Tel.: +49 2224 969500 > Fax: +49 2224 97691059 > Email: [email protected] > > HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur > Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989 -- With best regards, Vladimir Andreev General director, QuickSoft LLC Tel: +7 903 1750503
