-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote: > > If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main > "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging > allowing to receive second /22 etc. >
So you agree my initial reply that actually the change does not go far enough, it'd be better to completely prohibited selling IP (v4) and instead enforce withdrawing of not announced IP-Space aand returning it into the pool? That way I am pretty sure we could quickly loosen the current /8 policy and return to a policy allowing requests of more then one /22 if need is shown .... and need may NOT be selling, but that'd be forbidden anyway then ;) BR - -- Jens Ott - - Gesch?ftsf?hrer - Opteamax GmbH Simrockstr. 4b 53619 Rheinbreitbach Tel.: +49 2224 969500 Fax: +49 2224 97691059 Email: [email protected] HRB: 23144, Amtsgericht Montabaur Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Jens Ott Umsatzsteuer-ID.: DE264133989 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVOPfFAAoJECrmRJLVnvx6y/YH/0kKU6Utix3nbuwi3rs8TwMn LvrVbuzRosgU78LlNc+0rfY/BFCKPLQF0WFm5bCHn5ZkRH21jr8ETkSGWgnGCge2 LuboUF5E9cPpcahMJw4ZP6WNyfZkNQzzXckaALqmN8j2snIfmfutvoiZY6zkjW+7 cLu0ePgnsN4ZeopMSDsRubY65oChrhmKfA5dTvB6sQdEsjmj7jL1dAGVx5A74NTH 2Z4a52c/VGccs+/wPDyaqLc9RL5if3gqg6Om0IB7bJglmcKaVoxESyDmb3heFXNP 0YT3Psl/ySTGPlspUztuMyefektjedB4ndmoId5n5Zjxd/bI3XKmeBAPyKTdxTE= =MjkK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
