Vladimir, +1 23 Апр 2015 г. 17:24 пользователь "Vladimir Andreev" < [email protected]> написал:
> I am just speaking about how easy requirement about making assignments can > be passed. > > 23.04.2015, 17:19, "Matyas Koszik" <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Opteamax GmbH wrote: > >> On 23.04.2015 15:39, Vladimir Andreev wrote: > >>> If we suppose having multiple /22 per LIR is abusing then main > >>> "abuser" is RIPE NCC since RIPE NCC makes transfers and LIR merging > >>> allowing to receive second /22 etc. > >> So you agree my initial reply that actually the change does not go far > >> enough, it'd be better to completely prohibited selling IP (v4) and > >> instead enforce withdrawing of not announced IP-Space aand returning > >> it into the pool? > >> > >> That way I am pretty sure we could quickly loosen the current /8 > >> policy and return to a policy allowing requests of more then one /22 > >> if need is shown .... and need may NOT be selling, but that'd be > >> forbidden anyway then ;) > > > > Announcing globally was never a requirement to receive IP addresses from > > RIPE, and changing policy retroactively is not a nice thing to do. And > you > > wouldn't deter this kind of 'abuse' at all, if you're in the internet > > business I'm sure you know how easy it is to set up an announcement for a > > prefix. > > > > Matyas > > -- > With best regards, Vladimir Andreev > General director, QuickSoft LLC > Tel: +7 903 1750503 > >
