On 5 Jul 2015, at 20:05, Petr Umelov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> So I suggest to return this proposal to discussion phase.

That’s not how it’s done. The discussion phase for the proposal is OVER. The WG 
has just about reached consensus. At this stage of the PDP (Last Call) we 
assess whether that consensus determination is valid or not. Last Call also 
gives everyone a final chance to raise NEW issues which did not get attention 
during the proposal’s discussion phase.

If there are new issues, please go ahead and raise them. Your latest message 
seems to be going over the same old ground. If you are doing that, don’t. It's 
inappropriate and unhelpful. [And just a waste of everyone’s time too.] Please 
stop posting more of the same stuff that the WG has heard. The WG has addressed 
those concerns already.

If there is something substantive to your latest posting apart from that 
earlier discussion, please state clearly what those new issue(s) are and 
explain how/why they were not addressed during the discussion phase. You’ve 
certainly not done that yet. Nobody’s found any fault with the summary of the 
proposal discussion that Sander posted a couple of weeks ago. 

I would be happy to support returning this proposal to the discussion phase, 
but only if there are compelling reasons to do so. To date nobody has made the 
case for taking that action. Although some have asked for this, nobody has put 
forward anything to justify these requests. The case has not been made yet. 
It’s up to you and your fellow travellers to make that case.




Reply via email to