On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:44:00PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
Besides, there's no RIR policy
correct
-- or reason to have one --
Isn't "provide an incentive to actually start deploying ipv6 services" a good enough reason? It is in my book. It certainly provides a much better reward than having 4 or 5 stars on the RIPEness page.
which doles out extra v4 allocations to LIRs who deploy v6.
If there's a compelling case to justify overturning current policy, it's not being made in 2015-05. I'm sure everyone here will be delighted to consider that case when someone presents a convincing argument which shows why the current policy is defective for the RIPE community as a whole. Over to you...
Please do not presume to speak for me or "everyone else" for that matter. Kind Regards, Sascha Luck
