Hi > On 21 Oct 2015, at 4:53 PM, Aleksey Bulgakov <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really envy to all of you that you have so much free time to write messages > here during all day and increase noise. >
I won't call it noise, a mailing list are there for discussion things about certain topic, if you are not interested, you can unsubscribe. > 21 окт. 2015 г. 18:48 пользователь "Sander Steffann" <[email protected]> > написал: >> Hi, >> >> > Op 20 okt. 2015, om 23:57 heeft Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN >> > <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 20:00, Randy Bush wrote: >> >> what is it that people do not understand about "gone, no more, we're >> >> out, ...?" >> > >> > Because it's NOT. Not yet. Not in RIPE-land, not in APNIC-land, not even >> > in LACNIC-land. Not to mention AfriNIC-land. >> >> The current policy is "we reserved some address space so that new entrants >> are not blocked from the market". I have seen many people interpret that as >> "we have not yet run out". For all practical purposes we *have* run out. >> What we have left is not normal address distribution anymore but a "special" >> situation. Business-as-usual with IPv4 doesn't exist anymore. To be blunt I >> think that "we haven't run out" is a extremely misguided (a.k.a. delusional) >> viewpoint... >> >> The point of this policy proposal is to see whether we can optimise this >> special situation by changing some of the parameters. To discuss if the >> results of changing i.e. "one /22" to "one /22 every 18 months" would help >> people while still providing an acceptable timeframe for being able to give >> addresses to new entrants. >> >> But please realise that the normal IPv4 pool has run out and we are only >> discussing the usage of a reservation we made for special circumstances. >> >> Cheers, >> Sander
