On 20 Oct 2015, at 23:38, Sascha Luck [ml] <[email protected]> wrote: > Isn't "provide an incentive to actually start deploying ipv6 > services" a good enough reason? It is in my book.
There's nothing stopping you from writing up and submitting a policy proposal which does that. The reasons for the low levels of IPv6 deployment are many and complex. IMO it's highly improbable for tweaks or special incentives in RIR IPv4 allocation policy could be a significant factor. YMMV. That's probably a discussion for another forum than this list. >> If there's a compelling case to justify overturning current >> policy, it's not being made in 2015-05. I'm sure everyone here >> will be delighted to consider that case when someone presents a >> convincing argument which shows why the current policy is >> defective for the RIPE community as a whole. Over to you... > > Please do not presume to speak for me or "everyone else" for that matter. I'm sorry for presuming that this WG welcomes and develops sound policy proposals. If that's no longer the consensus view of the WG, I apologise.
