On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, remco van mook wrote:
I hope you understand what we want to achieve. Give a chance to those
that have registered as LIR after Sept. 2012 to receive a *bit* more
space from the central registry (as the prices for small allocations via
the transfer market is really high).
- would you agree with an other way to achieve this? If yes, please
share your thoughts on how this proposal could be amended.
Well, sure, why not. I think it's a very bad idea for a whole pile of other
reasons, but if you were to draft a policy that would allow additional NEEDS
BASED
allocations to existing LIRs from address space that gets RETURNED to the RIPE
NCC that is outside the final /8 pool (so basically, allocated pre-2012), that
would
sound very reasonable, fair and good for competition.
Yes. That was my idea as well, when we were discussing the last /8 policy:
that I would have liked to have a "last /8 policy" to be about the "last
/8", i.e. 185/8 and then the possible other free pool could have been
treated differently.
But now this seems all overtaken by events and we have left what we have
left.
The major result of this proposal is likely to be an empty free pool and
the broker market as the only market.
I do not support this policy.
Cheers,
Daniel
_________________________________________________________________________________
Daniel Stolpe Tel: 08 - 688 11 81
[email protected]
Resilans AB Fax: 08 - 55 00 21 63
http://www.resilans.se/
Box 45 094
556741-1193
104 30 Stockholm
