On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 14:57, Daniel Stolpe wrote: > Yes. That was my idea as well, when we were discussing the last /8 policy: > that I would have liked to have a "last /8 policy" to be about the "last > /8", i.e. 185/8 and then the possible other free pool could have been > treated differently.
Not sure that separating pools would have made things easier to accept. Some people gave me their opinions about this issue, and at that time (~6 weeks ago) there was only 1 (one) voice in favour of having separate pools. But again, if this makes it easier to pass, having distinct pools (newcomers & further allocations, 185/8 and recovered, ...) is an option for me as a proposer. Personally, I'm even in favour. > The major result of this proposal is likely to be an empty free pool and > the broker market as the only market. We will get there anyway. Worst things is that we (RIPE community) kickstarted this market too early. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
