Hi,

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:41:02PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote:
> >> My suggestion would be along the lines what was proposed on the APWG
> >> meeting already - earmark these /24s as non-transferrable, ever.
[..]
> Transfers that have already happened should not be affected of
> course, but we can make a policy that stops new transfers being
> made in the future. I would prefer to disallow any new transfers,
> independent of when the assignment was made, to avoid a rush on the
> NCC for new memberships.

+1 :-)

(Now we're entering shedpainting land - "all /24s?  all /24s allocated
from the wait queue in 2021?  all /24s and all previously allocated /22s?"
- I'd go for "/24s allocated after Jan 1st 2021", as anything more harsh
will be hard to get consensus on)

gert
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg

Reply via email to