>>Actually, the point is to have something to offer to the newcomers.
We can update the transfer policy and transfer hold time to 60months or even more to make it less attractive, Also make a change to the policy to make no /24 allocation to multi LIR accounts. Regards, Arash On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 6:41 PM Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 06:03:53PM +1100, Arash Naderpour wrote: > > >My suggestion would be along the lines what was proposed on the APWG > > >meeting already - earmark these /24s as non-transferrable, ever. > > > > I don't think it is a good idea to split the IPv4 addresses into > different > > types, transferable and non-transferrable. it puts those newcomers in a > > disadvantageous position compared to the older members, it is not fair > and > > doesn't fix anything in long term. > > Actually, the point is to have something to offer to the newcomers. > > If we do not stop the hoarding *now*, there won't be any IPv4 left - would > that be "more fair" to the newcomers? > > > I wouldn't mind a policy that says "The RIPE NCC does no longer deal in > IPv4 resources at all. Everything coming back into the RIPE NCC free > pool is returned to IANA." - that would be maximally *fair* (the same > amount of nothing for everybody), but I assume you wouldn't like that > either. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
