Hi, On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 06:03:53PM +1100, Arash Naderpour wrote: > >My suggestion would be along the lines what was proposed on the APWG > >meeting already - earmark these /24s as non-transferrable, ever. > > I don't think it is a good idea to split the IPv4 addresses into different > types, transferable and non-transferrable. it puts those newcomers in a > disadvantageous position compared to the older members, it is not fair and > doesn't fix anything in long term.
Actually, the point is to have something to offer to the newcomers.
If we do not stop the hoarding *now*, there won't be any IPv4 left - would
that be "more fair" to the newcomers?
I wouldn't mind a policy that says "The RIPE NCC does no longer deal in
IPv4 resources at all. Everything coming back into the RIPE NCC free
pool is returned to IANA." - that would be maximally *fair* (the same
amount of nothing for everybody), but I assume you wouldn't like that
either.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
