Thanks Glen. I'll stick to the avi route.
--- In [email protected], Glen Tubbesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Better to go AVI, then to go to tape and back into Pro, as you should
> get less of a reduction in quality keeping the movie file in the
digital
> domain, rather than recording it to tape then playing it back. Of
> course, if you want a better quality than an AVI file, you'll need to
> use a lossless codec, so that there's no compression/decompression
> cycle. That's where the quality loss occurs.
>
> Glen in Vegas
>
>
> Steve & Sharon wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the advice Richard. Your assumption is correct. Premiere
> > Elements projects are filed as .prel which are not recognized by Pro.
> > I even tried copying & pasting the timeline from Elements to Pro but
> > the clipboard would not carry from one to the other.
> > However, thanks to Glen, he stated the obvious. Why is it sometimes we
> > don't see the wood for the trees. I exported the movie to .avi and
> > then imported the .avi into Pro, which worked perfectly. But this
> > leads me to one last question. There is an obvious reduction in
> > quality using .avi as the go between. Would it be better, albeit not
> > as quick, to export the Elements movie to tape, and them import the
> > tape into Pro?
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
