> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 02:22 -0700, Don Hensley wrote: >> The sole and only goal of BadVista Advocate is to show the Vista is bad, >> and >> why [...] >> >> Proposing alternates is not actually part of the mission [...] >> >> Although technically discussion of other OS's, even totally Free ones >> like >> gNewSense, is not actually part of the mission here. > > Are you sure? > >>From http://badvista.fsf.org/blog/welcome-to-the-badvista-org-campaign: > "Welcome to BadVista.org, the Free Software Foundation campaign opposing > Microsoft Vista adoption and spotlighting free software alternatives." > > "With your help, we will [...] provide a user-friendly gateway to free > software adoption" > >>From http://badvista.fsf.org/blog/launch-press-release: > "The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today launched BadVista.org, a > campaign with a twofold mission of exposing the harms inflicted on > computer users by the new Microsoft Windows Vista and promoting free > software alternatives that respect users' security and privacy rights." > > ...twofold mission. Providing a link to gnewsense.org in the press > release doesn't accomplish the second part of that mission. > > > (What does Wikipedia say about losing sight of your mission?) > > Kind Regards, > M.F. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Advocate mailing list > [email protected] > http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate >
Ya, thanks for writing what I wanted to say =) Thats why I said previously, it is good to list down all missions somewhere. So as to minimize conflict on the sight of mission among members. So who is going to do that? --- Lam YongXian Adolflam.com FSF member #5279 _______________________________________________ Advocate mailing list [email protected] http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate
